Search for: "Matter of W J. (B J.)"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
§ 16-676(B). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
And Bey makes clear that the same is true of speech on matters of private concern. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:55 pm
Senator John J. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 3:17 pm
Ct. 63, 69 (2020) (Gorsuch, J. concurring). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court did not err because the facts in both cases were similar enough to be admitted for 404(b) purposes. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 pm
Sally Rand, 'Fan Dance' 1942 It has been quite some time since I considered the ongoing and slow motion--and well curated--theatre that has been the search for the causes of so-called Havana Syndrome (last discussion at The Affair of the Sonic Weapons Attack: The Mystery that is at its Most Useful When it Remains Unresolved). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
(b) Where the original intention is not immediately apparent, the requester bears the burden of proof, which must be a heavy one (J 8/80, loc.cit., Reasons No. 6). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
These are appeals against the orders of the Butcher J and Flaux LJ concerning the construction of certain provisions in insurance policies written by the Appellant Insurers, and obtained by a range of businesses and organisations, which purport to provide coverage in the event of business interruption. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
However, according to the patent, the combination with vitamin B 12 reduces this toxicity, as vitamin B 12 reduces the level of methylmalonic acid without altering the effectiveness of pemetrexed. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:10 pm
Warby J was unimpressed by Tesco’s reliance of potential reputational harm: no rational member of the public would, knowing the facts, think worse of Tesco or shun it, particularly given the historic nature of the matters ([46]). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
(MD Fla. 2017) (rejecting the interpretation that §230(c)(1) protects removal decisions because it would "swallo[w] the more specific immunity in (c)(2)"). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
., that it’s a “flat,” or categorical, prohibition (p.316), and that therefore moral questions involving a judge’s participation in an abortion case are even “easier” than in a death penalty case because “[b]oth the state and the unborn child’s mother are (at least typically) acting with gross unfairness to the unborn child, whereas the moral objection to capital punishment is not that it is unfair to the offender” (p. 344 n.159).3. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
Lindsey B. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
Id. at 22 (Brook, J., dissenting). (1) Court of Appeals had appellate jurisdiction despite defective notices of appeal where court granted defendant’s petitions for writ of certiorari in its discretion and State did not object; (2) Sufficiency of evidence argument was not preserved and defendant’s argument did not warrant invocation of Rule 2 of the Appellate Rules of Procedure; (3) Where the defendant was not given an opportunity to be heard and no other evidence showed that… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Lester B. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Lester B. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
W. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
As a quantitative matter, what was copied was a rounding error. [read post]
