Search for: "Matter of Welfare of C. Children"
Results 221 - 240
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said in this Article 78 proceeding raises the questions whether (1) the County Commissioner of Social Services has discretion as a matter of policy and without regard to the facts of the particular case to refuse a special grant to an aid to dependent children recipient who claims that she and the children are destitute because cash has been stolen from her and (2) whether the proceeding can be maintained as a class action. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Instead, the court’s focus, and that of the parties, must be the welfare of the child. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
There are several reasons for this: fear of death; procrastination; and misinformation (people presume that only the rich or married with children need to have wills). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:06 am
id=1156&a=WHEREAS, the parties intend toestablish a domestic partnership andraise children together, and desire to setforth their agreements and expectationsregarding their financial, property, andother rights and obligations arising out ofthe contemplated domestic partnership; and,WHEREAS, by execution of this Agreement,the parties hereby revoke and nullify any andall written agreements previously executed byeither or both parties; this Domestic PartnershipAgreement supersedes any and… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Ira C. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
But plain packaging seems to be rooted on the idea that trade marks harm consumer welfare and that consumers are somehow better off if they appear much less on the goods. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
’ (Welfare & Institutions Code, § 730, subd. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said this Article 78 proceeding raises the questions whether (1) the County Commissioner of Social Services has discretion as a matter of policy and without regard to the facts of the particular case to refuse a special grant to an aid to dependent children recipient who claims that she and the children are destitute because cash has been stolen from her and (2) whether the proceeding can be maintained as a class action. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
Employers sponsoring health plans and members of their management named as plan fiduciaries or otherwise having input or oversight over the health plan should verify their company’s group health plan meets the out-of-pocket maximum rules of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1) as well as a long list of other federal health benefit rules to minimize the risk that violations will obligate the sponsoring employer to self-assess, self-report on IRS Form… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
Under its provisions, federal law now limits the amount of the maximum deductible, co-payments or other cost sharing that most employer or union sponsored group health plans can impose on essential health benefits to the out-of-pocket limitation allowed by ACA § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Further reduced penalty caps are applicable to submissions for certain 501(c)(3) organizations and for Top Hat and Apprenticeship programs. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions under Section 502(b)… [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
Section 11 provides that local authorities (2) … must make arrangements for ensuring that— (a) their functions are discharged having regard to the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of children; and (b) any services provided by another person pursuant to arrangements made by the person or body in the discharge of their functions are provided having regard to that need. (3) In the case of a local authority in England, the reference in… [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 5:35 pm
McKinney's Session Laws of N.Y.1982, C. 916, § 83. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:18 pm
Finally, due to respondent's inability to understand the consequences of his actions, the Presentment Agency is concerned that respondent may pose a danger to other children in his community. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
” The Federalist No. 78, p. 465 (C. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
These could include disestablishing or privatizing marriage in favor of a contractual model, or broadening it (or some new legal status) to include caring relationships of whatever number and mix of genders.[3] Ronald C. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Stepparents and California Family Law: Issues and Pointers by Michael C. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
