Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy" Results 221 - 240 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to look to the English roots of the Sixth Amendment and the duties of counsel in other countries today when it considers the case of an American death row inmate” in McCoy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A legal malpractice claim accrues when relief can be obtained in court (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]) and from the time the actual injury stemming from the malpractice occurs, not when it is discovered (Id.). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This is true even where the plaintiff is unaware of any malpractice, damages, or injury (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 300- 301). [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on McCoy v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:05 am by Raymond J. McKoski
On September 28, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in McCoy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
United States: Standard for the court of appeals to correct a plain error; McCoy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There was no evidence that the parties contemplated further representation of the defendant by the plaintiff after the entry of the judgment of divorce in the divorce action (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April 2017); English… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
Even if the General Assembly hadn’t acted, the state supreme court cast doubt on McCoy last month in State v. [read post]