Search for: "McDonald v. Strong"
Results 221 - 240
of 245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
Then, a week after the Circuit Court decision, the McDonald group filed theirs (McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am
The Chicago Sun-Times reported yesterday on an amicus brief filed this week by 55 members of Congress, including Democrat Mike Quigley of Chicago, in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:34 am
Justice Benke's approach is fine if you already agree with her about the result, and have a strong preexisting view about the need for expansive seizure rules, but I think that Justice McDonald does a better job of writing an opinion that attempts to persuade. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:47 am
" In anticipation of oral argument in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:45 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
The article will be part of a symposium issue on McDonald v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
During a slow week at the Court, the amicus briefs filed Monday in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:08 am
Those protections were once quite strong â€" Graham v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel discusses the differing approaches of merits briefs filed Monday by the petitioners and the NRA in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:29 pm
Cruikshank in 1876 and Presser v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Part 1 and Part 2 of this series examined the historical context of the debate surrounding dairy product food safety, and the mechanisms by which pasteurized or raw dairy products may become contaminated with foodborne pathogens. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
” Isolation of the “outbreak strain” from a food product provides strong support (“The Smoking Gun”) for epidemiological studies implicating the same food; however, a positive food sample is not a requirement to take action to prevent new illnesses (e.g., recall and/or stopping distribution of an epidemiologically implicated food). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:14 pm
How Appealing does an effective job here assembling the early major news coverage of the Supreme Court's decision to grant cert in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:21 pm
Chicago (08-1497) and McDonald v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Dilanchian), The three dysfunctions of a complex IP legal team: (IP Law360), IP litigation and WIPO: (Ezine @rticles), Time to nominate IP Hall of Fame inductees: (IAM), Product packaging and patent protection: (IP Law360), Understanding the value of IPRs in the context of fashion and visual arts: (Ezine @articles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands How logos, shapes and colours are remembered: (Class 46), Now obsolete .su (Soviet Union) domains still going… [read post]
