Search for: "McKenzie v. McKenzie"
Results 221 - 240
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
As Lord Justice Clark, Lord Gill chaired a review commission that recommended McKenzie friends be granted rights of audience in the courts. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
McKenzie Rothwell Barlow & Korpi, P.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:15 pm
McKenzie-Fiumara recently wrote a client alert regarding the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
In a year when at least one parent and one campaigner had been held in contempt of court for breach of that law (albeit a breach of a specific injunction rather than the rules per se – see Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376, the last in a series of judgments in that case [update 5 July : in fact there is a later judgment Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2498 which deals with the question of whether the court could make a suspended order on an application to… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
By Eric Goldman Karnaby v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:02 am
Quist, Judge Gordon Quist, Kent Beattie, Labor Statistics, Lateral Hiring, Lateral Moves, Laterals, Law School Lawsuits, Law School Litigation, Law Schools, MacDonald v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:02 am
Quist, Judge Gordon Quist, Kent Beattie, Labor Statistics, Lateral Hiring, Lateral Moves, Laterals, Law School Lawsuits, Law School Litigation, Law Schools, MacDonald v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
In McKenzie Check Advance of Florida LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:31 am
The case is entitled McKenzie v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:03 pm
The attorney for the lender, McKenzie Check Advance, contended that Bland's argument was foreclosed by AT&T v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
See Flaskamp v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:56 am
If you want to focus on the “how to,” you can jump directly to Part V, which describes Baker’s “Eight steps to implementing value pricing”: 1) Conversation. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
Supreme Court will be hearing arguments in April, 2012 on this issue in another case, Christopher v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) (glass in piece of cake); McKenzie v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:04 am
In Moreau v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:10 am
Rich Leonard will moderate a discussion featuring Douglas Baird, Susan Block-Lieb and Troy McKenzie. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Mr Terluk also had help from a Georgian “McKenzie friend”, a woman named Ms Margiani, who valiantly appeared in court with Mr Terluk and made submissions for him, as Mr Terluk himself apparently spoke little English despite having lived in this country since 1999. [read post]
