Search for: "Melendez v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  If the Court were to adopt the view that this is not enough to render a lab report testimonial, then it would be a simple matter for labs always to avoid the rule of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:16 am by Aaron Tang
Today in the Community we are discussing the latest in the line of the Court’s Confrontation Clause cases:  Williams v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-591 Case name: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
California, another case on the subject decided in 2008, was 6-3, and Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm by Lovechilde
The Court, in a majority opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg, reinforced the Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Supreme Court - United States - Government - Law - Judicial Branch [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
 Since Crawford, this practice has been limited, but hardly eliminated.Finally, there are forensic lab reports, as in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
 Since Crawford, this practice has been limited, but hardly eliminated.Finally, there are forensic lab reports, as in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:29 am by Kevin Goldberg
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that MCAC is not a state actor and granted the motion to dismiss. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am by Kevin Russell
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]