Search for: "Memorandum (1991)"
Results 221 - 240
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
State, 660 So.2d 1026 (Ala. 1995), the Alabama Supreme Court clarified its holding in Ex parte Rivers, 597 So.2d 1308 (Ala. 1991). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
Twenty years after Griggs, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 backhandedly acknowledged disparate impact as a legitimate Title VII cause of action. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division concluded that it was, commenting that despite the technical distinction between domicile and residence, the statutory use of the term "resident" is frequently construed to be synonymous with "domicile," particularly where the status described confers a privilege or benefit.In addition, the court noted that Syracuse had a “longstanding policy” of deeming the term “residence” to mean “domicile” as demonstrated by its… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:28 am
Staggs stated he had postsecondary education after high school during the years 1991-1995. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
Gardner stated in his sentencing memorandum on behalf of client Anthony Campana. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
I figured you might, so I drafted this memorandum to help you express your outrage at Perry’s latest actions. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:03 am
Willingham set the fire that killed his three daughters in 1991. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:11 am
Philadelphia 1991). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
In an order dated June 28,2005, we denied appellants’ request to consolidate the appeals.This Court issued two separate memorandum opinions (1) affirming the judgment of the trial court confirming the arbitration award, Chambers, 2006 Tex. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
West's Ann.Cal.Civ.Code § 1624.[7] KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote 185 Frauds, Statute Of 185VIII Requisites and Sufficiency of Writing 185k114 Signature of Memorandum 185k115.3 Sufficiency of Signature by One Party Only 185k115.3(2) k. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
MEMORANDUM FN** FN** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
"); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 52 advisory committee's note to 1991 amendment. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:03 pm
Zoeller worked as an executive assistant to Dan Quayle from 1982 to 1991 in Washington, D.C. while Quayle was a U.S. senator and later vice president, according to the statement. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:12 pm
Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd 14,396, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, illustrate this concept.In Fusco's case, the Commissioner of Education said that contents of the memorandum did not fall within the parameters of a "permissible evaluation" despite the school board's claim that the memorandum was "intended to encourage positive change" in Fusco's performance.In Irving's case, a school principal was given… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:43 pm
Always include a memorandum of law to your motion to tax costs citing the above cases and attach your invoices as exhibits to support your argument at the hearing. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The litigation now before the Court arises from the 1991 purchase by the Tribe's housing authority of a thirty-one-acre parcel of land in Charlestown, Rhode Island. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The Case Against The Death Penaltyby Hugo Adam Bedau --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ContentsPrefaceIntroductionDeterrenceUnfairnessInevitability of ErrorBarbarityRetributionFinancial CostsPublic OpinionAbolition TrendsFor Further Information & ReferenceNotes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------PrefaceHugo Adam Bedau is Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
May 1, 1991). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:26 pm
Republic of the Philippines, 951, F.2d 1414 (3d Cir. 1991); Permian Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
INS, 502 U.S. 129, 137 (1991) (holding that sovereign immunity bars fee award to prevailing party in INS proceeding); Foreman v. [read post]
