Search for: "Miller v. Municipal Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
Jan Dunning, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:56 am
If you or your client needs assistance evaluating state and local hotel occupancy tax statutes or preparing for what’s to come, Kean Miller is here to help. *********** [1] In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases (City of San Diego v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
The Court appears to be holding United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 8:14 am
” Hess v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Gregory Geswein, Kevin Krakora, and Sandra Miller, Civil Action No. 5:10-CV-01235 (N.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Such are the fundamental philosophical lessons of the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s recently published opinion in Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Those two cases are the consecutively numbered Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Arthur Miller – the civil procedure guru, not the improbable husband of Marilyn Monroe – is on the petition as Of Counsel. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
No. 1 LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:01 am
No. 1 LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Miller v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
It found (contrary to the Supreme Court’s later ruling in Walker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
Litigators were anxious to see how the high court would rule in Geico v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
Miller v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 03, 2008 US v. [read post]