Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 221 - 240
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
”Note: this memorandum opinion indicates the Court is modify existing Louisiana postconviction practice as it relates to Atkins claims without discussing how or why. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:25 am
If the employee is unhappy with the first opinion, second opinion, and third opinion, the employee may file a request for an Independent Medical Review (IMR) with the California Division of Workers Compensation administrative director. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:43 am
Opinion at 8-10. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 8:28 am
Two lawsuits were filed, arguing that Public Act 98-641 violated the pension protection clause. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:54 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed in this not-for-publication opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm
3. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Components, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-32-TS-EJF, slip op. at 2–3 (D. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
(Five concurring opinions and dissent) U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:25 pm
A delinquency petition filed against the respondent resulted in an admission to unauthorized use of an automobile [Penal Law 165.05[1]]. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:43 pm
A delinquency petition filed against the respondent resulted in an admission to unauthorized use of an automobile [Penal Law 165.05[1]]. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
R. 1:36-3. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
The new rules modify the regulation of conflicts of interest in the market for retirement investment advice, and consist of: 1) a new definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA and the Code; 2) an amendment to, and partial revocation of, PTE 84-24; and 3) the creation of the Best Interest Contract Exemption (“BICE”). [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
The Senator's floor comments left open the possibility that he would support some other initiative to reform the unionization process and identified the following specific suggestions: SOME SUGGESTED REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT (1) Establishing a timetable: (a) Require that an election must be held within 10 days of a filing of a joint petition from the employer and the union (b) In the absence of a joint petition, require the NLRB to resolve issues… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
The Senator's floor comments left open the possibility that he would support some other initiative to reform the unionization process and identified the following specific suggestions: SOME SUGGESTED REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT (1) Establishing a timetable: (a) Require that an election must be held within 10 days of a filing of a joint petition from the employer and the union (b) In the absence of a joint petition, require the NLRB to resolve issues… [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 2:33 pm
It is for this reason that Counts 3 through 10 alleging violation of 33 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:42 pm
The majority opinion (authored by J. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm
The petition also asks the Court to correct constitutional errors created based on the discovery that (1) Fennell did not give a consistent account of where he was on the night Stites was murdered and (2) all of the State’s expert witnesses who supported the State’s theory that Reed raped and murdered Stites have withdrawn or modified those opinions. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:00 am
But the board has a higher opinion of the skilled person, and consider him capable enough to bridge the gaps.The claims relate to a first device that stores 'multiple versions of application software'. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Durbin’s commitment as a sexually violent predator, disagreeing with his contentions that (1) the State had no authority under former RCW 71.09.030 (2008) to file an SVP petition against him in Clark County because he had no Washington convictions for sexually violent crimes; (2) the current version of RCW 71.09.030, Laws of 2009, ch. 409, § 3, cannot be applied retroactively to justify filing the State’s petition in Clark County; (3) the… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
(See Jan. 3, 2017 Judge Dow Opinion, ECF No. 216.) [read post]
