Search for: "Mr. Arnold" Results 221 - 240 of 1,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 12:40 am
., Judge of the High Court on The Importance of Case Analysis, Register hereWednesday 13 February 2019 6-7.30pm – Damian Falkowski, Barrister of Essex Court, on Drafting & Opinion Writing: The Golden Thread, Register hereWednesday 6 March 2019 6-7.30pm – Mr Justice Arnold J. on Patent Cases Explained - A Judge's Viewpoint, Register hereWednesday 27 March 2019 6-7.30pm – Ian Silcock, IP Barrister, on The Costs and Implications of… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In his pre-dinner speech at the CIPA life Sciences conference last week, Lord Neuberger wistfully commented that, if there was one case that he would like to have come back to the Supreme Court bench for, it was Warner-Lambert vs Actavis. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Mr Justice Arnold held that in some contexts, LNDR was capable of being understood as an abbreviation, but that there was no proof that it was descriptive in this way when applied to a swing ticket or label of clothing. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Back in mid-January (sorry for the delay in reporting this decision, dear IPKat readers), Mr Justice Arnold handed down his judgment in the long-standing easy trade mark battle: W3 Ltd v Easygroup Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 7.The core issue was whether the sign “EasyRoommate” and its variants which were owned by the Claimant, W3, infringed any of the the easyGroup's EU trade marks. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The trial judge, Arnold J, had already granted the claimant permission to appeal on quantum. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Paul Lockwood Arthur Bookout Among the most crucial issues in the world of directors and officers liability are the related questions of indemnification and advancement. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy reports: BREAKING NEWS: UK ratifies UPC Agreement.Another breaking story came from the CJEU, where Advocate General Wathelet handed down his opinion in the reference from Mr Justice Arnold in Teva v Gilead (C-121/17) concerning Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Mr Justice Arnold’s decision was that Sky has won its infringement claim – Sky’s registrations are confusingly similar to SKYKICK – subject to the validity of those registrations. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:05 am
The AmeriKat working off her impatience while awaitingthis morning's Article 3(a) OpinionThis morning Advocate General Wathelet handed down his opinion in the reference from Mr Justice Arnold in Teva v Gilead (Case C-121/17) concerning Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:44 am
In an audacious move, the CJEU not only reformulated the national questions (much criticised by Mr. [read post]