Search for: "Mr. Booker"
Results 221 - 239
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2007, 12:28 pm
Justice Scalia seems to be constructing an argument that a specialized form of Sixth Amendment violation happens when appellate courts review sentences: Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:18 am
Following Booker and a remand pursuant to Crosby, the district judge imposed a principal sentence of 7 months' incarceration and 7 months' home confinement (as part of a 3-year term of supervised release).To justify this sentence, the judge pointed to, inter alia, (1) the fact that, "from everything I can see, Mr. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 6:17 am
Sentencing Law and Policy is simple the resource for all things Booker. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 5:39 am
"He didn't even know who Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 9:13 am
Jose Francisco Gama-Gonzalez, No. 06-1965 (December 5, 2006): Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 7:52 am
Here, the sentencing court cited Mr. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:06 am
Mr. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 6:50 am
Mr. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:47 am
But apparently Kumar received a significant downward variance:Judge Glasser said that under federal sentencing guidelines he could have given Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 7:55 am
Booker,125 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 10:18 am
However, since Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 9:00 am
I am a big fan of increased sentencing discretion post-Booker, but I am troubled by the prospect of a sentencing judge saying something like this: "I see, Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
Especially in the sentencing area as the court tries to help the circuits an district courts make sense of the Booker/FanFan decision.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 4:02 am
Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 8:08 am
This discussion emphasizes that Booker does not change the message of 28 U.S.C. sec. 994(h). [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 4:39 am
Note: Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2005, 8:20 am
MR. [read post]
16 Mar 2005, 5:47 pm
It is unwarranted by the conduct, granted that Mr. [read post]
