Search for: "Murphy v. U.s.*" Results 221 - 240 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
The only reason removal is even possible prior to service is due to the advent of electronic case filing and waiver of service rules that could not have been foreseen when the current removal statute was enacted.Id. at *6 (discussing and attempting to analogize to Murphy Brothers, Inc., v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm by David Ettinger
Murphy:  Was defendant’s conviction under Penal Code section 115 preempted by Vehicle Code sections 20 and 10501, subdivision (a)? [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Murphy, 97 U.S. 120, 125 (1877), which asks whether an element of an accused product "performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain the same result" as an element of the patented invention. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
This is thanks to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]