Search for: "N B A PROPERTIES INC"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
Please note that Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in this case on behalf of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, National Fair Housing Alliance, and NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. in support of the petitioner. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:40 am
” Likewise, ConfédérationInternationale des Négociants en Œuvres d’Art (CINOA) expressed the view that “the scope of ‘illicit activity’ involving antiquities has been highly exaggerated by advocates of implementing such controls. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
See Bromberg & Ribstein on Partnership, §3.05(b)(1) (some footnotes in brackets): Neither the partner’s individual rights to possess partnership property nor the fact that the partner possesses such property in a representative capacity on behalf of the firm and the other partners has been determinative. * * * [I]n Bellis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:46 am
The explosion created a crater 32 feet square and 16 feet deep and resulted in one fatality, injuries to several others, and extensive property damage. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
R. 60(B)(3)) Useful Precedent GTE Automatic Elec., Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
Supp. 3d at 911 & n.6 (taking judicial notice of such marks in the public record). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
Sportswear Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Fiserv, Inc., et. al. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm
§ 134.005(b). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
United States, 659 F.2d 618, 622 n. 12 (5th Cir. 1981). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Asylum, Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Owners Ass'n, Inc., 317 S.C. 200, 452 S.E.2d619 (Ct. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
In his view *it was clear from the Patents Act 1977 s.7(2) that a patentable invention was "property" and that the inventor was the first owner of that property unless one of the circumstances mentioned in s.7(2)(b) applied;* if s.7(2)(b) did apply, so that another person was entitled to the whole of the property in the invention before it was made, that other person was then entitled to apply for and be granted a patent, and if the inventor… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:01 am
The court then moved to the substance of defendant’s argument, that applying G.S. 14-269.2(b) to defendant under the facts of his case violated his Second Amendment rights under the “historical tradition of firearm regulation” analysis required by New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Elle lui reproche aussi de n’avoir pas pris au bénéfice des petits investisseurs les mesures palliatives qui, dans le cadre de la crise financière dénoncée par la lettre du mois de mars 2009, ont été prises en faveur des grands investisseurs détenant de semblables placements. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
Firehouse No. 1 Bar-B-Que Rest., 771 F.2d 521, 524 (D.C. [read post]
