Search for: "N. LILLY"
Results 221 - 240
of 267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereo Noted here: Work Place Prof Blog and Ross Runkel, each noting post-argument briefs on the effect of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on the caseGross v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:05 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 536 F. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 283 F.3d 254, 272 n.11 (5th Cir. 2002); Williams v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:09 am
" And, although "companies including Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Medtronic have all said they will start reporting payments to docs...that reporting typically starts at a floor higher than $50. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
That trend will continue, as a new administration and Democratic Congress enact laws–such as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act–that expand or create new legal remedies, and cut back on or repeal federal statutes and administrative regulations that have in the past preempted state-law based suits. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Doyle says it is not criminal for nurses claiming discrimination to quit or for attorney to advise clients that they could quit; noted here, here* SETTLED* Naomi Campbell settles national origin discrim etc suit by Romanian ex-maidNC* FILED* 59yo magistrate denied 4 year reappointment; files EEOC age discrim chargeNC* [1-12] T-N-T Carports sued by EEOC for religious harass of fem evangelical; says she was called devil-worshipper* NEWS* Fired Black fem United Way CEO releases 12-22 EEOC… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
App.4th at 98 n.4, 99. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 536 F. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 99 F.R.D. 126, 128 (D.D.C. 1983)). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Lilly, 533 S.W.2d 130, 131-34 (Tex. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:08 am
"[A]n invention may be enabled even though it has not been described. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
Gaines 109,567 20,317 0 20,209 150,093 Karen N. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
S. 101 , n. 7 (2002). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:19 am
Crews took a combination of Humalog, a quick-acting form of insulin taken with meals, and Humulin N, a medication designed to supply a constant source of insulin to the body. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
Previously, the Federal Circuit has stated that "[a]n adequate written description of a DNA, such as the cDNA of the recombinant plasmids and microorganisms of the claimed invention, requires a precise definition, such as by structure, formula, chemical name, or physical properties, not a mere wish or plan for obtaining the claimed chemical invention. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:01 am
Eli Lilly and Company et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:34 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, 65 NY2d 449, 492 NYS2d 584 (1985), "If the issue has not been litigated, there is no identity of issues between the present action and the prior determination. [read post]
