Search for: "Nautilus"
Results 221 - 240
of 457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2014, 11:36 am
These included Nautilus v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:52 pm
With Miami’s influence and celebrity power, it is no wonder that the city has been chosen as the home of several new domestic brands, including 1 Hotel South Beach, SIXTY Hotel’s Nautilus South Beach, and Tommy Hilfiger’s recently purchased Raleigh Hotel. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 9:17 pm
ACI faculty will offer sessions on: • Protecting patents in light of increasingly strict § 101 patentability standards post-Myriad and USPTO patent eligibility guidelines • Demystifying the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting and analyzing its interplay with patent term extension (PTE) post-Gilead • Using inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) offensively and defensively in the life sciences space • Drafting strong claims and protecting patents in… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:53 am
I’d probably put the Court’s analysis of definiteness in Nautilus v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm
By Jason Rantanen This opinion is notable because it involves an emerging split in the Federal Circuit’s jurisprudence on “X plus function” claim language. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:35 am
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that plaintiff's medical device patents were invalid as indefinite. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:38 am
Defendant Stealth Cam, LLC ("Stealth Cam") requested that the district court reconsider its Claim Construction Order holding that the term "extending parallel" was not indefinite. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:18 pm
Apple contends that regardless of the Teva ruling, the Ancora case should be vacated and remanded in response to the Court’s ruling in Nautilus. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
So that leaves us with a case a lot like the Nautilus case last year, in which both of the parties, as well as the Solicitor General, advocated standards for assessing the “definiteness” of patent claims that were well nigh indistinguishable. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:45 am
Major substantive decisions by the Supreme Court – in Mayo, Alice, Nautilus, and Octane Fitness - have provided new tools for patent challengers to draw upon in infringement suits, and inter partes review has become an almost automatic procedure. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
Particularly the Supreme Court took strong pro-defendant positions in Alice Corp (patent eligibility), Nautilus (indefiniteness), and Octane Fitness (attorney fees) and, at the same time, the new post-issuance review proceedings have proven to be effective mechanisms for challenging patents in parallel to court actions. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:19 am
In the underlying motion, R-Boc argued that the Supreme Court’s recent Nautilus decision which relaxed the indefiniteness standard — created a new indefiniteness argument regarding the term “approximately perpendicular. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
Patent cases suggest modernity, but in a recent patent case involving heart monitors, Nautilus v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:03 am
Furthermore, the Supreme Court’s Nautilus decision was about the phrasing of the indefiniteness test, not the meaning of words of approximation, which are common in patent claims. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
by Dennis Crouch In Robert Bosch v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
by Dennis Crouch In Robert Bosch v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Along with Alice, we have a set of additional legal issues that favor accused infringers, including indefiniteness (Nautilus) and fee shifting (Octane Fitness). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
The Court addressed indefiniteness in its June Nautilus v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm
Nautilus (S. [read post]
