Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan" Results 221 - 240 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2014, 7:48 am by Walter Olson
But the rest of it did happen, in the celebrated case of New York Times v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am by John J. Sullivan
”  But that’s not the real advantage of spending much of my time in Cozen’s New York office. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”13 Or as the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, put it over a century ago, property “is intended to embrace every species of valuable right and interest and whatever tends in any degree, no matter how small, to deprive one of that right, or interest, deprives him of his property. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
In two cases involving Clint Eastwood and the National Enquirer, in which Eastwood alleged that the tabloid knowingly printed false stories about him and advertised them on its cover in order to increase its circulation, courts have used the familiar standard from libel law, first set forth in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  (You know, like New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   As discussed here, on September 28, 2011, Southern District of New York Judge Richard Sullivan granted the insurers’ motion for summary judgment. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am by LTA-Editor
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a groundbreaking ruling denying first sale protection to resellers of digital music. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Jillian Stonecipher
Robert Welch, Inc.), and in many cases with actual malice (New York Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
  On a similar topic, Mat also has criticized The New York Times in an article entitled, "The New York Times Is Wrong: Strong Passwords Can’t Save Us. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  In their complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2002, they alleged that a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (“Royal Dutch”) and Shell Transport and Trading Company PLC (“Shell”) aided and abetted human rights violations that were committed by the Nigerian government in response to protests by residents of Ogoni against the environmental effects of oil exploration in the… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
In their complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2002, they alleged that a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (“Royal Dutch”) and Shell Transport and Trading Company PLC (“Shell”) aided and abetted human rights violations that were committed by the Nigerian government in response to protests by residents of Ogoni against the environmental effects of oil exploration in the region. [read post]