Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
The case is Yates v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm
That’s the Supreme Court of the United States, in Yates v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:54 pm
United States that the Sarbanes-Oxley accounting law’s prohibition on evasive destruction of “tangible objects” cannot be used to prosecute a fisherman who discarded undersized grouper in hopes of avoiding enforcement. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
In the four-one-four ruling in Yates v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:22 am
United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
Happy labeling.The second decision today is an antitrust case, North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
The case, Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
The case, Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Links: NWC Amicus brief in Powers v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
United States, argued before the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:44 am
Courts that have taken the former view, the highest of which is the Fifth Circuit in Asadi v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:01 am
The appeals court thus dismissed a terminated employee’s Dodd-Frank whistleblower retaliation claim, finding it subject to the provisions of his arbitration agreement with the employer (Khazin v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:11 am
Because an employee’s state law claim was based on the same facts as the claim she brought under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, an amendment to that Act invalidated an arbitration agreement she signed as applied to both claims, a federal district court in Arkansas held. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:52 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:15 am
Affirming a $30,000 award to the employee, the appeals court also ruled that SOX affords noneconomic compensatory damages, including for emotional distress (Halliburton, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
