Search for: "Olsen v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 2:42 pm by Bruce Nye
    Well, in July of last year, another Court of Appeal came out with a decision in Olsen v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Again, a state supreme court put the kebosh on the contrary federal prediction, Dorsey v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Making a Decision at the Dairy Case, Farmers’ Market, or on the Farm As described in Part 1, there is considerable variation from state-to-state in the way raw dairy products are regulated in the US. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Milkborne disease outbreaks by Food category, United States, 1973-2005 (source: FTCLDF via CDC). [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
In 2005, Washington state investigated an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 linked to a cow-share, and found the outbreak strain in raw milk and environmental samples at the dairy (CDC 2007). [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:09 am
The Recorder is reporting that Theodore Olsen and David Boies, former opponents from the Bush v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:15 pm
  Additional analysis of Olsen can be read here in a previous post: Olsen Full analysis of the Prospect v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
The furious (and now completely  ridiculous) battle over  which attorney gets to argue Carcieri v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
  But since the state's democratic framework involved a vote of the three parties --  two of whom wanted Olsen -- it was not adequate enough to fool Larisa. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
David Frederick began arguments for the state of Maine with a lengthy exchange with the Chief Justice and Justice Alito, both of whom were hard pressed to find a distinction between this case and Riegal v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]