Search for: "P. v. Collins"
Results 221 - 240
of 537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
Collins is applied differently in the educational context. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
” Collins & Chaltain, supra, at 277. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
P. 86. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
See Collins v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:47 am
Collins, Boston University School of Law June 26, 2014 Boston University Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 1485 (2011) Boston Univ. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
To cut a long judgment short, Collins J rehearses all the relevant authorities on this topic, and concludes that the test in X v UK, and accordingly in the Guidance, is too high. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Defense Attorney: Jeffrey P. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
One form of anonymity, as Westin explained, is what is claimed by an individual who wants to present ideas publicly but does not want to be identified as their author: p. 32. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
One form of anonymity, as Westin explained, is what is claimed by an individual who wants to present ideas publicly but does not want to be identified as their author: p. 32. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm
; Sims v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:04 am
Judge Mark effectively distinguished R v Coventry CC ex p Morgan, QBD, 07.07.1995 (in which Collins J held that public sector accommodation was not an appropriate comparator for private sector rents) by restricting the ambit of that case to comparing like with like “so far as practicable” ([28]) or “so far as reasonably possible” ([32]). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:04 am
Judge Mark effectively distinguished R v Coventry CC ex p Morgan, QBD, 07.07.1995 (in which Collins J held that public sector accommodation was not an appropriate comparator for private sector rents) by restricting the ambit of that case to comparing like with like “so far as practicable” ([28]) or “so far as reasonably possible” ([32]). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
Supp.); Sims v. [read post]
