Search for: "P. v. Kelly"
Results 221 - 240
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2012, 3:30 am
Association v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:25 am
MANNING CONSTRUCTION v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
[Eagan, Minn.] : West, 2012 v. ; 26 cm. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
In a 4-3 decision in Hill v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
Murray and Joel P. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:42 am
Justice Mary Beth Kelly wrote for the Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
As stated, we also concur with Justice MARY BETH KELLY’s issuance of mandamus. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:33 pm
In two dissents, Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway (each joined by Justice Kelly) argued the majority was “creat[ing] an illogical and unworkable rule” that closes the door to justice except in “the rarest of situations. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:03 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:36 am
In three cases consolidated under the lead case of People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:56 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:40 am
Kelly, M.D. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
In a lead opinion authored by Justice Mary Beth Kelly, and joined by Chief Justice Young and Justice Zahra, the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
On July 30th, the Michigan Supreme Court published the opinion of Chief Justice Young, joined by Justices Markman, Mary Beth Kelly and Zahra, in Douglas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
In Price v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:12 am
In Velez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
At the outset, this Court notes that the advisory opinions of the Committee on Open Government (which were inconsistent here and upon which both sides thus rely to various extents) are “neither binding upon the agency nor entitled to greater deference in an article 78 proceeding than is the construction of the agency” itself (John P. v Whalen, 54 NY2d 89, 96 [1981]; see Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. [read post]