Search for: "P. v. Love" Results 221 - 240 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 4:44 pm
It’s my on the road v. at home ratio for the last two weeks. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
State laws defining and regulating marriage, of course, must respect the constitutional rights of persons, see, e.g., Loving v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:20 am by Caroline Shaw
II”, Liverpool Mail, February 13, 1864, p. 5.[2] 686 Kelly v Sherlock, Queen's Bench Division, 13 June 1866, (1865-66) L.R. 1 Q.B. 686. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 8:53 am by Richard Hunt
The inefficiency and sometimes outright stupidity of ADA litigation is perfectly illustrated by Love v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Guiora, Polygamy: Not 'Big Love' But Significant Harm, (Women's Rights Law Reporter, Rutgers University School of Law (2014 Forthcoming)).Sean T. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Loving is perhaps the best anchor—do we really want a polity without the protections against miscegenation laws, ushered in by Loving? [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:52 am
Jacot, 235 Ariz. 224, 330 P.3d 981 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by OBABL Staff
We’ll have to read Professor Maillard’s book “Loving v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I’ve been loving everything Stuart Carpey has been putting out lately. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
* A big attraction on 5 December is a pair of hearings involving Centrotherm, not to be confused with, er, centrotherm: these are Case C-609/11 P Centrotherm Systemtechnik v centrotherm Clean Solutions and Case C-610/11 P Centrotherm Systemtechnik v OHIM and centrotherm Clean Solutions. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm by Ken
Here it was, Saturday night, and I was all set for a relaxing evening: a few beers at the Yard House and then a movie with my lovely wife, perhaps a few (or a few dozen) turns of Civ V (with the expansion), and sleep. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 12:59 pm
Love, 134 F.3d 595, 601 (4th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]