Search for: "P. v. Rogers" Results 221 - 240 of 670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Weber, New ›Cosmopolitically‹ Founded Concepts for the Cyberworld Roger de Weck, Dem Vertrauen vertrauen Erika de Wet, Developing a Doctrine on the Status of International Judgements within the South African Legal Order Luzius Wildhaber, Québec, Schottland, Katalonien – Gedanken zu Sezessionen in Demokratien Rüdiger Wolfrum, Some Reflections on the Making of International Law Valentin Zellweger & Roland Portmann, Das Völkerrecht im… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:51 pm by WSLL
  You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
App. 1990) (a contractual waiver of liability will not protect a person guilty of gross negligence); Rogers v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
  If, for example, Article III does not allow P to sue D, it makes sense that P can't get around that principle by first having P2 sue D and then moving to intervene in the lawsuit. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:45 am
DHSMV, 34 FLW 520, DUI, Adm review of suspension - licensee was denied due process when hearing officer failed to issue subpoena for individuals who inspected breath test, although inspection reports authored by these individuals were received in evidence and considered by the hearing officer in sustaining the license suspension - circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in concluding the hearing officer did not have the authority to issue subpoenasThe Law Offices of… [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:46 pm
Galazz, 34 FLW 335, 3rd DCA, suspended sentence, standing alone, is an illegal sentence - power to suspend sentence can be exercised only as incident to probation - trial court properly vacated the plea - to render suspended sentence illegal, it would be necessary to add term of probationChen and Fifnje, 34 FLW 339, 2nd DCA, Anticipatory warrant - U.S. v. [read post]