Search for: "P.R." Results 221 - 240 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 4:05 am by rgeorges
They may win a few skirmishes in the the patent wars; but, the P.R. hit will be long lasting and severe. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:26 pm
Congratulations to Tom "Waylon" Hughes and his highly paid superflacks and p.r. consultants for putting this one over. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:08 am by Michael C. Smith
., 6:10cv011 (7/5/12) Judge: Leonard Davis Holding: Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity GRANTED Following the Court's Markman opinion last December, it became clear that the Plaintiff intended to amend its contentions pursuant to P.R. 3-6(a)(1) based on the Markman ruling. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm by Michael C. Smith
 In determining whether good cause for amending contentions under P.R. 3-6 exists, "the Court has broad discretion and considers four factors: “(1) the explanation for the party’s failure to meet the deadline; (2) the importance of what the Court is excluding; (3) the potential prejudice if the Court allows the thing that would be excluded, and (4) the availability of a continuance to cure such prejudice. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm by Adam Levitin
 The GSEs claim that when a loan defaults, the property is automatically transferred to the servicer, so that the servicer can foreclose in its own name (and Fannie and Freddie's names never appear, which would be bad for P.R.). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:45 am
The whole charade is being orchestrated by a p.r. outfit called DHM Research. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:30 pm
But in Portland, there is always news, because garbage has become an enormous ordeal, and the city has an army of p.r. flacks hired to make it look like fun, or a religious experience, or something. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:24 pm by Mandelman
It seems obvious that the article below was designed to look like a news story, but was generated by  the P.R. department at the California State Bar in direct response to my recent articles and podcasts on the topic. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:20 pm
" These are the endless rosters of p.r. flacks that are draining local government payrolls to sell unwanted shinola to constituents. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:11 pm by Eva Arevuo
Related articles The Rise of the Killer Drones: How America Goes to War in Secret (rollingstone.com) Drones’ new weapon: P.R. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:44 am
And as Portlanders know all too well, there are hundreds of p.r. flack jobs in government nowadays. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:32 am by The Docket Navigator
The Court does not require in a complaint the specificity that P.R. 3-1 requires, as that would go far beyond Rule 8's and Form 18's requirements, but some greater specificity is required here. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:48 am
It's breathtaking, when you think about it: Local government in the Portland area has millions and millions of dollars to hire p.r. flacks and tweeters to spin the facts for the politicians' and bureaucrats' benefit. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:44 am by Ralph A. Dengler
Critics of Twitter’s move, the article reported, describe it as a public relations ploy, a “P.R. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:48 am
Not only do they have one of the highest paid p.r. dudes in the state on staff -- Erik Sten's old buddy, Jim Middaugh -- but they also have an in-house "reporter," Nick Christensen, who publishes articles on the Metro website. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:21 am by Michael C. Smith
The orders also set today as the date for compliance with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 (Infringement Contentions), but this date was not marked with an asterisk, and thus a change could be made by the parties in their proposed dco. [read post]