Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 221 - 240
of 587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:46 pm
Rothamel v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Neighbors testified about noise, overnight parking and trucks backing into the property causing a problem on a busy road. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Neighbors testified about noise, overnight parking and trucks backing into the property causing a problem on a busy road. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:09 am
See Rosenberger v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 6:36 pm
Greenport Grp., LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 am
The Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:08 am
A clause depriving a citizen of access to the courts should clearly state its purpose. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
City of Fresno (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 683, 705 (“Woodward Park”) and Environmental Planning & Information Council v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
” Diaz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:12 pm
Shore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:35 am
Park Hill Association et al., 408 N.J. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:05 am
As the Supreme Court correctly found, the published notice of hearing referenced section 100-18 of the Code of the Village of Tuxedo Park, which was sufficient to fairly apprise the average interested citizen, including the petitioner, that the “line of sight” variance was being sought. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 9:24 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:15 am
Under the Supreme Court's decision in Katz v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
Citing Bailey v. [read post]