Search for: "PEOPLE v. JACOBS"
Results 221 - 240
of 694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
As the judge commented, “spying on a journalist would be to investigate the people with whom the journalist is in contact. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The framers of the United States Constitution recognised this, understanding the people ‘not as rulers, but as judges able to check the legislature’. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
TeeVee Toons, Inc., 555 F.3d 949, 955 (11th Cir. 2009) (existence of license asserted as an affirmative defense to copyright infringement claim); Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am
It involves three people: the victim, Ruth Williams, strangled to death in her apartment; Paul Scrimo, who was convicted of murder; and John Kane, who was present at the time of the murder. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:43 am
So it relies on an Eleventh Circuit case, Liese v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:48 am
The Court of Appeals (Droney, Jacobs and Leval) says "Comments allegedly made by Alles and Matranga to LeGrand’s co‐workers satisfy each of these elements, even if they were not made in LeGrand’s presence: reasonable people would find an environment to be hostile if supervisors make racist comments about them behind their backs. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm
Supreme Court decided to hear Apodaca v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm
Supreme Court decided to hear Apodaca v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
(Lucas v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:59 am
Not good [Sam Bieler via Scott Greenfield, Jacob Sullum] Judge rules that New Jersey may not automatically suspend driving privileges over unpaid child support without a hearing to establish willfulness, lest it violate due process and fundamental fairness [New Jersey Law Journal; Kavadas v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Scripps NP Operating dba The Corpus Christi Caller-Times v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
Irwin Jacobs (Qualcomm Co-Founder), Steve Mollenkopf (Qualcomm CEO), and Dr. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Legal Applications of Marketing Theory, part 4 Steve Ansolbahahere & Jacob Gersen, Harvard University, Dept of Government & Harvard Law School, Consumer Confusion in the Law of Food (Are People Misled?) [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
Jacob Gersen & Joel Steckel, Harvard Law & NYU Stern, Conference IntroductionSteckel gave a talk on dilution years ago and RT tore him apart (sorry!) [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
