Search for: "PLEASANT v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:25 am
Pleasant Valley State Prison , 2017 Cal. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
The first did just that, the second was moderately interesting and the last made Bastard Hill seem rather pleasant in comparison! [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
Today's Salt Lake Tribune reports on the decisions.In Summum v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
Dreeben argues in Turner v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
“Indeed, it is not easy to imagine how government could function if it lacked this freedom,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the Court in 2009 in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
The case, Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:38 am
Drug offenses in Massachusetts were made more difficult to prove by the United States Supreme Courts' decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:03 pm
In Ruiz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
Parra (Jose) v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:30 am
” In fact, in the 15 weeks between the Court’s hearing on Nov. 12 in Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
” Pleasant. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:34 am
The long-awaited decision in Standard Oil v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 8:59 am
See Lomonte v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 8:59 am
See Lomonte v. [read post]
