Search for: "POTTER v DISTRICT COURT"
Results 221 - 240
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Generally speaking District judges are failed solicitors, Circuit Judges have a better knowledge of law and I have had brutal experience at hands of Senior circuit judges. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
Potter Federal Magistrates Act Voir Dire Jurisdiction: Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
As mentioned by Current Awareness, The Times reports today that the Court of Appeal has upheld the decision in S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam), under the headline: "Ex-wife wins new home and £50,000 a year maintenance - for her horses". [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Techdirt), (Techdirt), Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Biotech patent law: eleven key pending cases and future developments to watch: (Hal Wegner), (PatentDocs) Study by The Innovation Group highlights damaging intellectual property has been to biotech: (Techdirt), Drug regulatory agencies collaborate on counterfeits, new medical products: (Intellectual Property Watch), Canada: Health Canada releases summary report on industry consultations regarding… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:39 pm
Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:02 pm
Anthony Falzone writes about the court's decision to stop publication of The Harry Potter Lexicon, ruling against Fair Use. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
"The District Court analyses leading case law in the issue of transformative and derivative works (such as Castle Rock Entertainment v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:30 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:33 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
We, therefore, REVERSE the district court's judgment and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0296p.06 2008/08/15 Desai v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:30 am
United States, the court considered whether a taxpayer could bring a tax-refund suit in a federal district court if he did not first pay all of the taxes sought by the Treasury. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:38 am
POTTER; from Harris County; 1st district (01-06-01042-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)(billboard lease)No. 08-0414ERIC H. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
Both the district court and the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Ms. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
So, for example, if I review the new Harry Potter movie, I can use the trademark "Harry Potter" in my review without fear of liability because it is both descriptive of the source of the film (the Harry Potter franchise co-owned by Warner Brothers and J.K. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
Blackmun had only a few years earlier been propelled from obscurity when he wrote the court's 7-to-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
Blackmun had only a few years earlier been propelled from obscurity when he wrote the court's 7-to-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
