Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 923
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 12:00 am
Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013), protections established under both the state and federal constitutions have been expanded to apply in the context of certain land use and zoning decisions requiring local government-imposed exactions or conditions to satisfy the following two (2) legal standards initially articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Nollan v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:17 pm
Heights of Lansing, LLC v Village of Lansing, 2018 WL 1747777 (NYAD 3 Dept. 4/12/2018) [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm
As Thomas put it, it is “difficult to justify” subjecting the Lundgrens to yet another round of litigation over the tribe’s claim of “a sweeping and absolute immunity that no other sovereign has ever enjoyed—not a State, not a foreign nation, and not even the United States. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:17 am
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects, among other rights, the freedom of speech. [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:43 am
In this case, the Second Circuit, finds for the plaintiff, a police officer who was retaliated against for speaking on matters of public concern in his capacity as a union representative.The case is Montero v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:30 pm
” According to the National Park Service, the Act provided “the first general legal protection of cultural and natural resources in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:57 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
at ¶¶ 5-7)On March 25, 2016, WTC removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:37 am
United Parcel Service challenged UPS’s Personal Appearance Guidelines. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm
Sturgeon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm
Sturgeon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
United States Sentencing Commission as “suggest[ing] that habeas might not even be available for ‘probabilistic’ claims. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
For example, the Court stated: “The fulcrum this case turns on is the direct link between the government’s demand and a specific parcel of real property. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 2:02 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., 511 F.3d 974, 985 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:46 am
The Ninth then decided United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
(Citing Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
The tone of Hawkins’ argument was set three sentences into his presentation, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted to ask pointedly: “Is it not the case that no other political entity would be immune from such a quiet-title suit, not the United States, not a state of the United States, not a foreign government? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
