Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Price" Results 221 - 240 of 830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 am by Holly Filius
The reduction established by the case of Bielicki v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:37 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision and ruled in the case of Feleccia v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii,  Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania)  exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota,  and South Dakota)… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
When Congress passed the Federal Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986 in response to skyrocketing insurance premiums being charged for, and the lack of available, commercial liability insurance, a new regime was born. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Kevin Kaufman
A portion of the law was recently reversed in the court case Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has granted allocatur in the case of Bourgeois v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, holders of ETF shares purchased in a secondary market, i.e. not directly from the issuer, attempted to bring a Section 11 suit against the issuer. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Unknown
If tariffs cause the price of automobiles to increase, as surely they will, a $3,000 increase in the price would generate, in Pennsylvania with its 6 percent tax, an additional $180 of sales tax revenue. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:12 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr. and Brian Slagle
” They also argued that any inefficiencies created by the proposed rule will result in higher credit prices and restricted access to credit. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court said as much when two important cases are read together: the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]