Search for: "People v Arnold"
Results 221 - 240
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am
As such shapes can be protected through intellectual property law, but whether Kit Kat's design is truly distinctive enough to be protected as a trade mark, has been a contested question here in the UK for several years, ultimately being referred to the European Court of Justice by Justice Arnold nearly two years ago in Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd (UK High Court of Chancery). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
The entire reason put forward by the EU (or EC as it then was) for extending the copyright term from fifty to70 years after the death of the author was that people in Europe were now living longer. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Garman Co., 843 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Ark. 1992); Arnold v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:09 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Arnold J acknowledged that it passed the Option 1 threshold but not that of Option 2. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
Court of Appeals decision (Storch v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
It held that for this purpose it is not sufficient that people resident in the jurisdiction may be customers of the claimant when they go abroad, although it could be enough if people in the jurisdiction obtain the right to receive a claimant’s services abroad by booking with, or purchasing from, an entity in this country, even if that entity is not part of the claimant. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
This was exacerbated by the fact that Amazon did not attempt to prevent any confusion by making it clear to people searching for “MTM Special Ops” products that it did not sell them. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and… [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
This was a bill that was vetoed by then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Arnold v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
I suspect that Sir Richard Arnold who was sitting in the front row might have permitted himself a wry smile at this suggestion. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
In times of plenty, people avoid going to court and spend their time making money through commercial exploitation. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Before Arnold J, it was common ground that the word "for" in claims such as those in the patent were to be understood as "suitable and intended for". [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
The group presented Carnival's new CEO Arnold Donald with over 100,000 signatures demanding that the cruise line update its 35 year old wastewater treatment practices. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Nuxoll v. [read post]
