Search for: "People v David S."
Results 221 - 240
of 5,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:13 pm
From today's decision by Judge Paul Oetken in Atas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
David Shafer (1:23-cv-03720) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Still): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
District Judge David A. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
Colmenero by Judge David Alan Ezra (W.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm
The opinion is today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
The focus on a line of statutory analysis enduring decades produces a texture that at first seems much like David Currie’s book on the Supreme Court’s work in its first century. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:06 pm
"] From Friday's decision in People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:52 pm
David N. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:52 pm
David N. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
In Kellerman-Bernard v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am
One commentator observed, “why did many apparently intelligent people get into a tizzy on the basis of the headline rather than what the Bishop actually said? [read post]
