Search for: "People v James Price" Results 221 - 240 of 431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
And speaking of Osnos, and speaking of the main purpose of this post: SECTION V. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Board and copyright: some cases see price as a copyrightable opinion: CDN v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
They argue that a few, large media corporations would undermine the diversity of offerings and consumer choice in the industry. [24] Antitrust law, they state, is not solely about price; it is about choice, and this includes the choice of quality and editorial viewpoint that a media oligopoly lacks. [25] Since media products inevitably bear the perspective of their corporate parent, the number of firms required to ensure media diversity is larger than that required to preserve… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
In short, no price, or sentence, is naturally right or wrong. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
First, there was the judgment of Mr Justice Tugendhat in the case of Andre v Price [2010] EWHC 2572 (QB) – given on 11 October 2010. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6140, James v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
James Madison, the primary architect of the Constitution’s Copyright Clause, said of it in the Federalist Papers, “The public good fully coincides… with the claims of individuals. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
James Madison, the primary architect of the Constitution’s Copyright Clause, said of it in the Federalist Papers, “The public good fully coincides… with the claims of individuals.” Pallante’s remarks, as she notes herself in her response to Lofgren, are primarily a restatement of what the Supreme Court said in Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]