Search for: "People v Kennedy (Michael)"
Results 221 - 240
of 387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
What’s confusing for many people is that this case is not about animal cruelty itself – laws in most states prohibit it, which is why, for example, Michael Vick got in big trouble for dog fighting. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:53 pm
v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
But when Sole v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am
Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Lots of people--Jonathan Adler, Emily Bazelon, Michael Dorf, Vik Amar, and others--are talking about standing. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
Oral argument transcript here: Most of the questions seemed to me more favorable to Static Control, though Kennedy said almost nothing.Steven B. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
by Michael C. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
by Michael C. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am
Supreme Court decision (Brady v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
Even the plaintiffs’ expert in Perry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons discusses the court’s decision earlier this term in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
(A draft article cowritten by Harvard Law School's Randall Kennedy lays out a wealth of evidence on this.[1]) Less than two weeks ago, the word was mentioned 52 times in the opinions in a Connecticut Supreme Court decision (State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
& Human. 17 (2005); Michael W. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
