Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
It appears that at least 32.5% of people will proclaim “TEFAL! [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
See Cairns v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
On 25 May 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has issued a landmark ruling that the UK’s mass surveillance regime violated people’s rights to privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:03 pm
Mr Mosley successfully sued the News of the World in what became a leading privacy case, Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EMLR 20. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
The statement highlights the strong overlap between promoting and protecting competition in digital markets and safeguarding people’s data. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
They have brazenly desecrated and defiled the national flag and emblem, incited Hong Kong people to oppose China and the Communist Party of China (‘CPC’), besiege Central People's Government (‘CPG’) offices in Hong Kong, and discriminate and ostracize Mainland personnel in Hong Kong. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:47 pm
I was riffing on The People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child announced the formation of recommendations for children’s online protections based on responses from more than 700 young people ages 9 to 22 from 27 countries. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The Court did not accept the claimant’s arguments that these passages of Lord Hope and Lady Hale in Birmingham v Ali did not apply to the grant of mandatory relief, or that they were limited to situations where suitability was disputed. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I urge you to consider Eichmann v. the People “I was just doing my job” is no defence. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I urge you to consider Eichmann v. the People “I was just doing my job” is no defence. [read post]
