Search for: "People v Mitch"
Results 221 - 240
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
That Michigan Court of Appeals opinion was People v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:33 pm
He also believes that Kelo v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
As I become aware of people doing these things, I confront them and shut them down. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
They're attempting to do through regulation what they couldn't do through legislation -- regardless of whether the American people want it or not. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
" Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made the following comments prior to the Senate votes yesterday. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:17 pm
For example, let’s look at the case of State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:41 pm
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) delivered following remarks on the Senate floor today (February 16) regarding a freeze in government spending. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:07 pm
Long ago, the court held in Singer v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:56 pm
When the Bush tax cuts were enacted in 2001 (and to some extent in 2003), many people thought that the sunset provision was a gimmick designed to limit the accounting damage from deeming the cuts permanent (at least in the sense that any legislation can be permanent, which is to say that it remains in effect until repealed). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:50 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
In a speech on the Senate floor, for example, Senator Mitch McConnell argued that documents from Kagan’s past “reveal a woman whose approach to the law was as a political advocate — the very opposite of what the American people expect in a judge. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
” And at the Huffington Post, Brennan Center attorney Monica Youn responds to comments made on the Senate floor last week by Senator Mitch McConnell, who criticized Kagan’s support of the government’s position in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:03 am
In the landmark 2006 case, Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
