Search for: "People v Sydney"
Results 221 - 240
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
Iin the case of Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells [2011] NSWCA 246 the Court of Appeal in New South Wales reversed the order of Levy DCJ that the trial of the action proceed without a jury. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm
Necessarily, it was submitted on behalf of the partiesopposing themother’s appeal that, although referring to it, the trialJudge could not be said to have relied in any discernable way onthe statementsin the Sydney Morning Herald editorial.... [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:58 am
Here is the abstract:his article explores the scope for freedom of conscience in the workplace when people of faith dissent from the values of the majority. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:09 am
The plaintiffs alleged that the two governments, by owning and operating these facilities between 1967 and 2000, caused or permitted the emission of contaminants on nearby people and property. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Intellectual Property Watch is a much-valued service to the IP community worldwide -- but it's not sufficiently valued for people to give it adequate funding. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Professor Rebecca Tsosie Part 2: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States, New Zealand, and Beyond View presentation here Johnson v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am
There is a news story about the case in the Sydney Morning Herald. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
This seems unlikely, as the New South Wales Supreme Court was named, in September 2010 as being the reason why Sydney the defamation capital of the common law world[5], because it was hearing more defamation cases than the courts of England and Wales combined. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
*Dr David Rolph lectures in media law at the University of Sydney Law School and is the editor of the Sydney Law Review. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
David Hamer, associate professor, Law Faculty, University of Sydney. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
In Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed [2010] NSWCA 335 the New South Wales Court of Appeal (Spiegelman CJ, Beazley JA,McColl JA, McClellan CJ at CL, Bergin CJ in Eq) gave judgment allowing an appeal in part against a defamation award of Aus$240,000. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
The legal precedent Joanne Turner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 pm
Ray Chesterton v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 982, 1 Sept 2010, McCallum J. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
In Halifax, Nova Scotia, the fire department’s two top officials have brought defamation proceedings against seven people, including two firefighters, over comments that were made anonymously on a local weekly newspaper’s website. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:21 am
In Chohan v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
” Neither explain how any of the proposed libel reforms could prevent people from bringing bad cases. [read post]
