Search for: "People v. Best (1983)"
Results 221 - 240
of 414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Second, it best captures the injury inflicted by partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
So, people can lie but computers can't . . . at least not yet . . . . [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
In YL v Birmingham City Council (2007) private sector care homes were found not to be functional public authorities. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
They therefore made no recommendation in respect of this class of prisoner.The recommendations put forward for remand prisoners were implemented in the Representation of the People Act 2000.4 The Act did not make provision for the enfranchisement of convicted prisoners, who remain disenfranchised under s3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, as amended.It is clear that successive governments have held the view that prisoners convicted of serious crimes which have… [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 959 (1983). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Va. 1983); Pollock v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
(Midler v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:05 pm
In the outrageous 1983 ruling in Los Angeles v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:26 am
I've included some excerpts below. ...See all stories on this topic People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am
**The bill includes the following: (6) In Bearden v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
The Texas Supreme Court does its best to thwart ordinary folks’ access to justice. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
Thus, while a § 1983 action for arrest without probable cause may be barred by the arrestee’s conviction at trial or by the arrestee’s guilty plea, see Cameron v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
” Hewitt v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:01 pm
Tenn. 1974)) and Alexander v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 1:56 pm
They recognized that medical decisions are best made in a clinical setting, not by a legislature. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
For example, in a 1983 Supreme Court case, Anderson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
In particular, the legislature was clearly reacting to an ordinance enacted in February by the city of Charlotte, which added “lesbian, gay and transgender” to the list of protected traits for antidiscrimination purposes and provided that transgender people can use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
Maybe it's the Rule of Law at its best. [read post]
