Search for: "People v. Blake" Results 221 - 240 of 317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Blake, where the defendant pleads to tampering, with an agreed recommended sentence of four years. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am by Russ Bensing
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  At his sentencing before then-Judge, now Ohio Supreme Court Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger, here's what happened per the appellate court's opinion in State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:18 pm by Tung Yin
How does he translate for her when people are talking over each other??? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  The first, NEJ v Helen Wood, was as the Press Gazette reports, granted on  9 April 2011 by Mr Justice Blake with the defendant then anonymised as “BDZ”. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Chris's discussion begins with a summary of New York law concerning marketability discount that I prepared for a post several months ago featuring the Cole v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by Aaron
Rowland: The court held that under the facts of this case, Blakely v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by litigationtech
He has provided trial presentation services in many high-profile and high-stakes matters, including the Dodgers McCourt divorce and People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Martin’s argument is that under Blakely v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]