Search for: "People v. Cook"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
This Kat has watched many cooking shows produced by Heston Blumenthal but has not yet been to The Fat Duck Restaurant (cheeky hint-hint if you, Heston, or your people are reading this). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:42 pm
I'm reading the transcript of the oral argument in Summers v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 10:46 am
People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 1:00 am
See Alborg v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:33 am
For example, Black people in Cook County, IL make up 24% of the population, yet represent 70% of people on EM. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 8:40 am
These questions were recently considered by the Idaho Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 8:40 am
These questions were recently considered by the Idaho Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 9:50 am
Nevertheless, the existential threat that COVID-19 presents is far from over, and scores of people continue to lose their lives to Coronavirus. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:18 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Court held in Cook v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
But it wasn't primarily due to the burn from the ECG pad.Which, perhaps, is why the jury awarded no damages.I understand that in both civil and criminal cases, people -- including those who testify under oath -- sometimes act more as advocates rather than neutral witnesses.But that's not what the process calls for. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Cook County, 506 U. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:04 pm
This is what happened to the defendant in People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:57 am
Don't we also want to avoid unjustly enriching people (perhaps like Cora here) who didn't, in fact, have a contract, but who are able to get past summary judgment and/or persuade a jury and/or extort a settlement? [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:30 am
Cosby v. [read post]
