Search for: "People v. Daniel" Results 221 - 240 of 1,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by azatty
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (ret.), and Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth V. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am by Eric Goldman
(An aside: O’Handley’s “combined social media following across all his accounts currently reaches over 3 million people and he has made 75 national news appearances in the last year and [a] half. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 6:38 pm by Michael Kang
Thanks to Danielle Citron for giving me the chance to share a few quick thoughts about Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
 UK and Australian patent attorney Daniel Rosenthal has written to tell the IPKat and Merpel all about a  website for people who want to describe their jobs (mainly scientific research) using only the 1,000 most common English words. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:08 am by Liisa Speaker
In this case of consolidated appeals of denial of motions to quash their bind-overs to Eaton Circuit Court on charges of owning a dangerous animal, People v Ridge, No. 333790 and People v Olney, No. 333791, the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for entry of an order quashing the bind-overs.Facts: Defendants Daniel Ridge and Debra Olney are married. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 11:19 am by Rebecca Jeschke
For the full motion to dismiss:https://www.eff.org/document/motion-dismiss-3 For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/garfum-v-reflections-ruth Contacts: Daniel Nazer    Staff Attorney and the Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents    Electronic Frontier Foundation    daniel@eff.org Vera Ranieri    Staff Attorney    Electronic Frontier Foundation    vera@eff.org Share this: … [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]