Search for: "People v. Dukes" Results 221 - 240 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by INFORRM
AWQC’s submissions on this point included the following: Unlike Warby J, the Court of Appeal disregarded binding case law which restricts the availability of representative actions for damages (notably Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 and Markt & Co. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am by David Doniger
The Supreme Court will hear challenges by America's biggest power companies to a landmark appeals court ruling in Connecticut v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 11:04 am by Ilya Somin
That argument leans on last year's 6-3 ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Sebelius, 18 No. 8 Westlaw Journal Health Law 1, Westlaw Journal Health Law December 21, 2010A federal judge in Virginia has rejected a key part of President Obama's health care reform law, ruling it is unconstitutional to require people to purchase or obtain health insurance or face a penalty. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Raynor v Murray ([2019] NSWDC 189) Gibson DCJ awarded the plaintiff damages of $120,000 for the publication of a defamatory email to 17 people in a building where the parties resided. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:00 am
Lynch: inappropriate to go after individual classes of people (ie--all blacks, or all Duke students)Connolly: trying cases in media generally not good for caseLynch: fear that all prosecutors have is that it's more than just NifongCassidy: if there's a big settlement with Durham, this might make prosecutors more cautious in the futureCassidy: AG Cooper's declaration of innocence was disrespectful to "victim"; several people in audience call out… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Duke Power and Albemarle Paper Co. v Moody, which expanded the law of employment discrimination to prohibit disparate racial impacts of racially neutral policies; and Thornburg v. [read post]