Search for: "People v. Dutch"
Results 221 - 240
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Here Brandsmiths' Andrew Lee pens a guest post on the dissemination of misinformation, or at least over-generalised information, to a wide audience of people who may not realise its true import. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
We attempted to file an amicus brief in Doe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:18 pm
For the record, earlier Sky v Avalon interim injunctive relief litigation, here, was the subject of a helpful guest Katpost by Gill Grassie, here.Hot technology: a car batterythat fits your LEGO set? [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am
They were, in descending order: Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench The Police Tip-Off and Cliff Richard – Dominic Crossley Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am
Why is this exercise so difficult when the main objective – better protecting peoples’ data – should be a consensus priority on the EU agenda? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:44 am
At the time, some people feared that the right would be misused by undeserving people to remove information about them online. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
” The court additionally relied on Congress’s intent that anti-money laundering statutes keep pace with new threats and techniques and cited SEC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:05 pm
People have also been fined for waving a middle finger (the Dutch equivalent to the two-fingered V-sign) at a police officer and calling a policeman ‘homo’. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
I read this passage as suggesting that the much-maligned “economic/non-economic” distinction in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
The Ninth Circuit Sure Doesn’t Know–Nguyen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
While business people may understand that compliance is necessary, compliance professionals often have to persuade business development personnel to see compliance as anything other than a burden. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
Recall that even the non-binding Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples took twenty-six years from conception to adoption. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
This includes, but is not limited to, law books -- some of which concern intellectual property, and some of which are written by people of the highest repute. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:25 am
" Rembrandt Social Media, LP v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
I wasn't nearly as "pro-Apple" or "anti-Android" as some people made me out to be, but when I said something positive for Apple, it reaffirmed many people's beliefs, and when I said something positive for Android, it didn't fit into the picture. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Province of North Cotabato v. [read post]
