Search for: "People v. Duty" Results 221 - 240 of 8,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Users of information tools in public contexts are not, of course, subject to the same duties. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:16 am by Mark Hartsoe
In negligence lawsuits, including those arising from car accidents, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:16 am by Mark Hartsoe
In negligence lawsuits, including those arising from car accidents, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:16 am by Mark Hartsoe
In negligence lawsuits, including those arising from car accidents, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:28 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Some are good, some are bad, some are just plan poorly reasoned and worthy of criticism no matter which side of the “v” you favor. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
Traditional “Common Law” Categories of People Coming Onto Land And The Duty of the Landlord to Those Entrants American Tort Law has always required landowners or lessees to protect people coming onto their property to some degree or another. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by David Cheifetz
Some of us are old enough to remember the commercial about the stockbroker company which was, in substance, when X talks people listen. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This is close to the scenario in Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]