Search for: "People v. Goldsmith"
Results 221 - 240
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Mr Pell mentioned Goodwin and and Clarkson but pointed out that the identity of the three claimants in Goldsmith v BCD was disclosed on 22 March 2011 (Zac and Sheherazade Goldsmith and Jemima Khan). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Preston, R (on the application of) v Wandsworth Borough Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 3174 (Admin) (01 December 2011) December 1, 2011 High Court: Removal of voting rights for people who leave UK for over 15 years not contrary to EU freedom of movement law, although could in principle if rules “unjustifiably interfere with the freedom of movement”. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
This list includes 13 MPs as well as legal figures such as Lords Irvine, Macdonald and Goldsmith. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 3:15 am
A civil suit captioned Mamani v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm
Jack Goldsmith was co-counsel for the defendants. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
Democratic bodies may represent the people, but they have a distinct identity which may need protecting. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
Derbyshire was applied to the British Coal Corporation in British Coal Corporation v National Union of Mineworkers and Another (QBD, 28 June 1996, unreported) on the basis that it was under the close control of a minister of a democratically elected government: and to political parties in Goldsmith and Another v Bhoyrul and Others ([1998] QB 459.) [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:12 am
We know because, on 22 March 2011, Mr Justice Tugendhat gave a public judgment (Goldsmith v BCD [2011] EWHC 674 (QB)) naming the MP and explaining the circumstances in which the injunction was granted. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
The claimant’s solicitors issued a Press Release Zac Goldsmith & Anor v BCD [2011] EWHC 674 (QB). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Thus, prudent businesses and business people will undertake a separate risk assessment to determine what additional steps to take before the Bill becomes law. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am
Developing… And if you haven’t seen Zac Goldsmith v Jon Snow on Channel 4 news last night – this is classic. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
We had a swell time at the show, met lots of great people, and look forward to next year's show! [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm
We had a swell time at the show, met lots of great people, and look forward to next year's show! [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:10 pm
If Clarence Thomas should have been denied confirmation because of suspicions that he commimtted perjury when he denied ever having a conversation about Roe v. [read post]
