Search for: "People v. Kent"
Results 221 - 240
of 627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Canada Former war correspondent Arthur Kent is seeking $1.2 billion in legal bills from Postmedia after their eight year legal battle ended this year when a Calgary judge found that Canada’s largest newspaper chain, and its columnist Don Martin, had defamed Kent in a 2008 article. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who observes that if “the defendant is sentenced to death, as people who commit horrible crimes frequently are and should be, the capital appeal defense cult stands ready to say that the trial lawyer was incompetent for taking the path that he did at each fork in the road, regardless of which one he took. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” Additional coverage of the decision comes from Dan Sullivan and others in the Tampa Bay Times; commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Hesse came up with this all on her own, so I asked myself how did this person end up being in the position she is currently in with the authority to do so much damage to so many people who don’t deserve it. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
” In The National Law Journal, Arthur Bryant argues that, although the Court’s ruling last Term in the class-action case Spokeo v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:50 pm
Kent wrote here about Virginia Gov. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm
See Kent v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
In Garrison v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Van Nes, 2016 BCSC 686 Kent v Martin, 2016 ABQB 314 Pritchard v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
Kent was awarded $200,00 in damages. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
And most people have never heard of it. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
The appeals court, in People of the City of Grand Rapids v Gasper (Docket No. 324150), distinguished this case from other disturbing the peace situations, and said: “There is simply no standard for determining what ‘destroys’ the peace and tranquility of a neighborhood, which compels ‘men of common intelligence’ to guess as to what conduct is proscribed by [the ordinance]. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
Kent v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Kent v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
’ He also said that ‘When people and companies use legal means to minimize their tax bills, that’s not corrupt or greedy or unfair, it’s playing by the rules. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
” Coverage of Wearry v. [read post]
