Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 221 - 240
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am
Permission to appeal has been granted by a panel of three Justices (Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr) and the case can now proceed to a full hearing. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
In Dalia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 10:10 pm
That can be argued about and people can be (hopefully) persuaded. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
H/t: Orin Kerr. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
Choate, 576 F2d 165, 174-177 (9th Cir. 1978) (government arranged for “mail cover,” under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:15 am
See Riley v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The intrusion associated with the (re)publication to the wider public of information revealed to a small number of people in open court is likely to be qualitatively different. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:32 pm
See Professor Orin Kerr's posts here, here, here, and here. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:48 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, lawprof Orin Kerr posts about the 6th Circuit decision in McKenna v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:30 am
United States, and Yates v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
In Atwater v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Sheesh, be careful out there, people. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
(Orin Kerr) Yesterday the Fourth Circuit handed down an interesting Fourth Amendment decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
People shifting on the leather-upholstered public benches make them creak like a sailing ship. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:21 am
Grant, 2009 SCC 32 Kerr v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Why are people suddenly using this word? [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:18 am
So I thought I would flag the opinion today in United States v. [read post]
