Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 221 - 240
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
”) Lord Kerr, like Stephens J at first instance, noted that that was not an immutable requirement as the ECtHR had stated in Mocanu v Romania (10865/09) (2015) 60 EHRR 19 (Paras 107-108 of Lord Kerr’s judgment) and as the Supreme Court had found in McCaughey’s case (See paras 118, 119 and, in particular, 139 of McCaughey’s case). [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:42 pm
See, e.g., Moreland v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
Further, past Supreme Court cases have presupposed understandings of the technology: In Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
” Under the principle of the venerable case of Martin v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
This is because the case will be suitable to proceed as a class action if some issues, including common impact, may be resolved for a class of people using common evidence at a common issues trial. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Roger Fairfax looks at Nelson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm
Griggs-Ryan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:28 am
This holding conflicts with a recent ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the high court held in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:16 pm
clerk circulated a 98-page draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:33 am
In Hein v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Actually, most people labeled them as Luddites. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
” Meanwhile, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
In his report for this blog, Lyle Denniston concludes that “nowhere near a majority of the Justices seemed prepared to rule flatly for or flatly against strip-searching of arrested individuals,” while Orin Kerr reviews the case in the context of Atwater v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:18 am
Roberts was directly overruled by Crawford v Washington. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
SSUK also passed on the names of two people who contacted them about volunteering, who then travelled to France and did a day’s work on the Steve Irwin. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
It could have been used to identify very large numbers of people and to track their movements around the country. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:48 am
Lyons (1985), Warshak v. [read post]
