Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 221 - 240
of 11,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
It'd have probably lost another $100,000 if the bond had been set in the right amount.There's also a funny line in the opinion in which Justice Stewart says: "In the course of our research we encountered—but cannot mention by name—a number of unpublished Court of Appeal decisions rejecting American’s argument and distinguishing [the 1919 Court of Appeal opinion]. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
" (People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
I bet that if he was released, and then ended up as a mass shooter, a ton of people would say: "It was so obvious! [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:01 am
LaVelle has published the provocatively titled “Of Reservation Boundary Lines and Judicial Battle Lines, Part 1 – Reservation Diminishment/Disestablishment Cases from 1962 to 1975: The Indian Law Justice Files, Episode 1” in the UCLA Indigenous Peoples Journal of Law, Culture, and Resistance. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Along these lines, it is not for the People to decide whether exculpatory evidence is reliable; that determination is for defense counsel alone (People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
In Samuels v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:49 pm
You can ask some people for tickets and not others. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 12:49 pm
In re Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 10:50 am
Check the Johnson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:42 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm
As people probably know by now, today a three-judge panel struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
It is not necessary to challenge the line of precedents based on Wickard v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
Two problems: (A) That somewhat conflicts with the opening line that to be raised, an issue must "be one which, in counsel’s professional opinion, is meritorious. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:04 pm
Stamp v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
On June 23, 2015, in State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
And push me to go back to a simple, bright-line rule that says that the crime is over when X leaves the house. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Two decisions -- People v Battaglia (56 NY2d 558 [1982], reversing on dissent of Hancock, Jr., J. at 82 AD2d 389) and People v Hicks (68 NY2d 234 [1986]) - - have appeared to be in conflict. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 10:24 am
NY's high court, in a 5-2 decision (People v. [read post]
