Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 221 - 240
of 21,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
" Rumsfeld v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
DotD points to the long-awaited decision from the Ninth in Irons v. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 7:38 am
Bronx D.A. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
The class-action suit, Kortlever et al v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 12:59 pm
Because, in truth, we know that there are still people who actually matter that do care about the appeal. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 3:46 pm
As long as that finding has some substantial evidence behind it -- and it clearly does -- no reversal on appeal. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:21 pm
I mean, sure, we want to stop crazy homeless people from going into houses that aren't *actually* theirs and drinking juice boxes and the like. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" initial people in the opinion. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
[¶] I am looking for a long-term relationship as . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
Ohio v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 10:19 am
Yet even with a track record for filing a high volume of decisions, some of the court’s justices allow cases to languish for as long as seven years — an extraordinary failure that causes untold harm to the people trapped in the backlog.Under national standards created by judges, court administrators, clerks and attorneys, 95% of appellate cases should be resolved within one year. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
So, they did what people have done for as long as people have had language and known fear - they made rules so they could feel less frightened. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
The Court is expected to release its long awaited opinions in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:44 pm
[In the long term, disarmament often leads to mass murder by government.] [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
(The panel doesn't speculate as to why the brief contains citations to two apparently made-up cases, but that sometimes happens when people use ChatGPT to write briefs; I can't tell one way or the other whether that's the problem here.)I read the brief. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
See Rhines v. [read post]
