Search for: "People v. Mathes"
Results 221 - 240
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm
The method correcting the math, applying something called a stochastic threshold to the data, resulted in many instances where previous matches from DNA, all of the sudden, were called into question. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm
A majority of the CAVC held in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:04 pm
If my math is correct, $44 million / $5 = 8,800,000 prospective strip club attendees per year, in Texas. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:20 pm
The math here is stunning. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:13 am
Incidents included a coworker drawing a camel with his name on it in the break room; being asked if he studied science and math so he could “blow up” the United States; being told that only stupid people do not believe in Jesus; being called a terrorist; being told to eat pork in an office meeting; being denied a day off in 2012 for Ramadan; and having a coworker tell others that Muslims and Egyptians practice polygamy. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 8:49 pm
I’d written, in a comment: One question the writers of “legal eduction” studies might ask – perhaps they have, I’ve never bothered to look – is “what does it tell us about law as a discipline that so many people who claim they’re no good at math, sciences, philosophy, logic etc. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
“Plagiarism, which many people commonly think has to do with copyright, is not in fact a legal doctrine. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:58 am
Consider The People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
Father’s decision to place daughter in public school arose, at least in part, from his concern that her home school experience did not allow her adequate exposure to differing viewpoints, including people who do not share her religious faith. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:30 pm
The entirety of the TCL v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Which brings us to Minnesota v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:52 am
The appeals court did the math. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 12:00 pm
Suppose we have done the math for some putative right and found it lacking. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:43 pm
Also see Witte v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
(Otherwise we'd have to prosecute by math.) [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm
Board of Education and Bolling v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
