Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 221 - 240
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
Teaching 100 percent of the cases on people kicked by horses will not convey the law of torts very well. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The first clause has prompted some to wonder whether Madison knew of Donaldson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
McKenna, Notre Dame Law School & Lucas S. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
CMS Cameron McKenna’s Rob Briggs discusses recent developments here. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:41 pm
From medical files that I have reviewed recently it seems that once experts have identified that there are toxic substances in a particular neighborhood or environment, people come forward with a long list of complaints and medical histories alleging that the exposure caused some, most or all of the illnesses. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Lemley, Stanford Law School: co-authored paper with Mark McKenna. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
"This was the best continuing legal education I've had in 17 years," attorney Don McKenna told me. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
2 May 2025, 10:39 am
The party that’s using it’s intent v. the consumer’s? [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
To take an example from Mark McKenna, suppose the NYT runs a story truthfully saying "Nike Announces New Shoe Line," and because Nike is so good at marketing consumers assume that Nike authorized that headline. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Phillip Carter is an associate in McKenna Long & Aldridge's Los Angeles Office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts practice group. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Some people suggest that dilution protection reduces consumer search costs. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 8:17 am
Mark McKenna (now at UCLA Law) Paul Mersino Pablo García Mexía Prof. [read post]
